4 ms·
Actually, prior documents released from Motorola and Apple show that Motorola wanted 2.25% of Apple's revenue for its patents[1] - on a $500 device, that's $1.5
by azylman 14y ago
Actually, prior documents released from Motorola and Apple show that Motorola wanted 2.25% of Apple's revenue for its patents[1] - on a $500 device, that's $1.50. Apple rejected those terms. Compare that to Apple's demand of $40/device from Samsung - it's not favorable.
[1] http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/04/what-motorola-wants-2-25-of-apples-iphone-sales-revenue/ http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/02/04/what-motorola-wants-2...
- bgeorgescu 14y ago2.25% of $500 is $11.25
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- ozataman 14y ago.. and that makes up a pretty hefty hit on the bottom line. A 2.25% drop in revenue could very well cause a >10% drop in profits, even with Apple's large margins.
- jsz0 14y agoI think this is an issue of FRAND vs. non-essential patents. Motorola has to license certain patents at reasonable costs. Apples design and non-essential patents have no price controls. They can ask for whatever they want. It's more similar to Microsoft's licensing deal where they get $10-$15 per handset for a handful of non-essential patents. If Apple has more of these non-essential patents that OEMs want to use $30-$40 might be the going market rate for them.