3 ms·
This is really interesting, thanks! I haven’t found a good summary of the history in a couple of minutes of searching. Do you know if it was just huge governmen
by mplanchard 1y ago
This is really interesting, thanks! I haven’t found a good summary of the history in a couple of minutes of searching. Do you know if it was just huge government investment that drove the increase? And what drove the public sentiment to want transit vs more highways or whatever?
- emptybits 1y agoAnother fact you may find interesting because it's unique, I think, for a North American city of its size: Vancouver has no freeways. Within city limits, there are no roads with speed limits over 50 km/h (30 mi/h), lots of traffic lights, lots of bus/bike lanes, and lots of congestion. The Trans Canada highway skirts along the side of the city but does not enter it. Things get slow, very quickly. There are complex historic reasons behind this. Politics, activism, lack of federal funding, etc. This is a decent article: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/may/09/story-cities-38-vancouver-canada-freeway-protest-liveable-city https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/may/09/story-cities-...
- mplanchard 1y agoThank you for the link! This potentially helps to explain the relative popularity of public transit. I’m glad at least some places saw the writing on the wall early with freeway-dominated cities. I think Detroit is an amazing example in the US of how much a sole focus on building our highways can cripple a city for decades.