5 ms·
Yep, someone decided that MAD was worth it or that they could win. It certainly looks like it's going to be a fun time for the lawyers and people with popcorn.
by simcop2387 14y ago
Yep, someone decided that MAD was worth it or that they could win. It certainly looks like it's going to be a fun time for the lawyers and people with popcorn.
So far we've got Apple suing Motorola, Motorola suing back. Apple suing Samsung, and now Google suing Apple. Any others I've missed?
- vasco 14y agoI guess in the end IBM would come into the room and shut everyone up.
- sigkill 14y agoHonest question, why? Don't most of the phones run on ARM? Or did you imply something on the lines of PC (or the POWER architecture)? /clueless
- option_greek 14y agoGo to any tech retail outlet, close your eyes and randomly touch any of the products they sell. I'm sure IBM has at least one patent covering it. The fact that they were here for a very long time and do a lot of pure science research means they are ahead of patent game than most. Here's one story about Sun shakedown in 80's http://www.osnews.com/story/24987/Microsoft_s_Android_Shakedown_IBM_Did_It_First http://www.osnews.com/story/24987/Microsoft_s_Android_Shaked...
- mdwrigh2 14y agoThis is Motorola suing Apple again, for the record.
- tedunangst 14y agoIf Google owns Motorola, they could put a stop to this if they wanted to, no?
- Mythbusters 14y agoand why would they? It's not that they vowed to do no evil or something.
- ok_craig 14y ago"Don't be evil" doesn't mean sit back and get sued to oblivion by your competitors like a selfless martyr.
- barista 14y agoDon't be evil means use your patents as a defense not to sue others. It means amass a big enough trove that others feel that suing you is going to be futile. Evil is attacking the opponent with the new patents you just "bought" not even developed in-house
- mdwrigh2 14y ago> Don't be evil means use your patents as a defense not to sue others. It means amass a big enough trove that others feel that suing you is going to be futile. Well, when a company is suing all of the companies that use your software over your software, but don't come after you, what are you supposed to do to protect them? Because obviously the "trove" wasn't "big enough". > Evil is attacking the opponent with the new patents you just "bought" not even developed in-house So now companies aren't allowed to use the patents of the companies they've purchased? Should patents be invalidated once the original company is acquired? I'm against software patents in general, but to argue, under the existing system, that one of your subsidiary's shouldn't be allowed to use the patents they developed because you acquired them seems absurd.
- jemfinch 14y agoThe reason having a large trove of patents makes it futile for others to sue you is precisely because you can respond to their suits with countersuits of your own.
- fellowniusmonk 14y agoSomeone? I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong. I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product. I'm willing to go thermonuclear war on this. - Steve Jobs