Any reason to not call bullshit on this paper? One of the biggest developments in language models over the last year has been test-time reasoning (aka inferenc

Any reason to not call bullshit on this paper? One of the biggest developments in language models over the last year has been test-time reasoning (aka inference scaling or “thinking”). Most vendors tested offer such a model. It’s plausible it could make a huge difference here, and they did not bother to test it or even mention it? Things like COT and planning can really affect this and those are just a couple of things that happen automatically in more advanced models. Seems like it wouldn’t have been hard to add this to the experiment, but they could’ve called it out in a “Limitations” or “Future Work” section. Or at least a single sentence like “We did not test chain-of-thought prompting, which may mitigate some of these issues”.