3 ms·
The problem here is that someone who consistently provides high-quality (or at least frequently-upvoted) comments / submissions will likely have less of a contr
by vitus 14y ago
The problem here is that someone who consistently provides high-quality (or at least frequently-upvoted) comments / submissions will likely have less of a contribution than someone with significantly lower karma. For instance: you would have (slightly) more influence than someone with 3000 karma and an average of 5.
- ljd 14y agoYou're right but because it's logarithmic, the difference is nominal and evaporates as a new member makes more posts. Plus, what is the downside to encouraging new members to post?
- ryaf 14y agoBecause newer members not familiar with the guidelines typically post the more inflammatory comments that we have seen as of late.
- ljd 14y agoThen this will reduce the amount of impact they have on the community as a whole. They will be doing us a favor by starting out ruining their karma. Also, to state the obvious, every member here was a new member at one time and I'm not ready to say that is "typical" behavior. It's just very memorable behavior. The whole reason why I submitted this was because PG said it wasn't the comments that cause issues but that bad comments were getting upvoted too much.