4 ms·
I use PG with Entity Framework in .NET and at least 90% of my queries don't need any PG-specific features. When I need something PG specific I have options lik
by pier25 1y ago
I use PG with Entity Framework in .NET and at least 90% of my queries don't need any PG-specific features.
When I need something PG specific I have options like writing raw SQL queries.
Having most of my data layer in C# is fantastic for productivity and in most cases the performance compared to SQL is negligible.
- romanhn 1y agoEntity Framework really is such a time saver. The PG adapter makes it a breeze not just with common queries, but also more recent stuff, like working with embeddings for vector search.
- theshrike79 1y agoComing from Javaland to C#, Entity Framework is a breath of fresh air. The Npgsql driver automatically applies PG-specific tricks without me having to do anything special The only path I had to do myself is the data ingress point that had some race condition issues, everything else seems to perform pretty well out of the box.