3 ms·
The whole thing is ridiculous. I found this pearl on their site: > "Recently we began the process of converting a huge RoR App that consists of 285,000 lines o
by acangiano 18y ago
The whole thing is ridiculous. I found this pearl on their site:
> "Recently we began the process of converting a huge RoR App that consists of 285,000 lines of Ruby code using less than 10,000 lines of Django code."
Here is another one:
> "Django requires far less code than Ruby on Rails because..."
> "Django does not reqire MVC (Model, View, Controller), therefore Django Apps require far less code"
Another one, the last I'll post, I promise:
> "We focus on recoding the Ruby functionality using Python code; this process takes place very quickly once it begins."
Can you say snake-oil salesman? BTW, Rails and Ruby on Rails have been trademarked to prevent people from pulling stunts like this.
Edit: Django is trademarked as well, so this should be easy to resolve. Also, Reddit did some research about the guy behind this operation (http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/7qoue/django_20/ http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/7qoue/django_20...). The results aren't pretty.
- catch23 18y agomaybe I should release Django 3.0 and steal their thunder.
- evdawg 18y agoThe best line on their site is definitely “The Ruby-Python-Bridge™ allows you to interface your Ruby and Ruby on Rails Apps directly to Python via TCP/IP.” What the hell does that even mean?
- shaunxcode 18y agohaha incredible - the truth wrapped in a lie. I believe they have implemented that macluhan-inspired concept of a "hyper" link which is allowing them to bridge the cyber-sphere via tcp/ip! Great work gentlemen.
- noonespecial 18y agoWhy its the same thing as "coalescing business paradigms via synergy" but with teh interwebs. That or using peanut butter on a duck. I'm not sure.