I think this is the author's point. The ability to write short and concisely is a skill. So goes the saying: "If I had more time, I would have written a shorter

I think this is the author's point. The ability to write short and concisely is a skill. So goes the saying: "If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter." Using LLMs to do that shortening is potentially hindering that practice. The author's point I think is less about sending LLM waffle, it's a lot more that they can't send something that is indistinguishable from LLM waffle anyways due to skills issue - because the LLM is so often used instead of building that skill. I think the question is largely, can the LLM results be used for human learning and human training, or is it purely a shortcut for skills - in which case those skills never form or atrophy.