I don't see much disagreement in the comments here? However there seems to be some people who only read the blogpost and did not actually follow the link to the

I don't see much disagreement in the comments here? However there seems to be some people who only read the blogpost and did not actually follow the link to the original assignment [0].. you can tell their response by the lack of mention of "terminal inspired" features. Sadly this happens during discussions sometimes, especially when original author did not mention all the relevant facts in the post. anyway, the exchange went like this: Kagi: "please build terminal-inspired email client, you can choose which email flows you'd like to implement." Applicant: I am going to spend a week building it, using golang, AWS, TMPL etc... I am also going to fit it onto 2 html pages. Kagi: Sounds great! Applicant: After a week, I have built something using golang, AWS, TMPL etc.. It has nothing to do with terminal, and does implement any of the email flows completely. Kagi: Not at all what we are looking for. Rejected. I don't see any way to blame Kagi for that exchange. Who would have thought the candidate decided to ignore half of the requirements? [0] https://archive.md/A95Ju#selection-549.5-549.63 https://archive.md/A95Ju#selection-549.5-549.63