4 ms·
Hilarious how Grok apologizes for going off-topic further down in the thread, but then can't resist the urge to immediately bring up white genocide again. http
by jsheard 1y ago
Hilarious how Grok apologizes for going off-topic further down in the thread, but then can't resist the urge to immediately bring up white genocide again.
https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922667426707357750 https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922667426707357750
Then someone asks it to just answer the original question but it ignores the query entirely and writes another wall of text about white genocide.
https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922687115030380581 https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922687115030380581
Then when asked yet again it seems to use the tweet it was originally asked to verify as a source to verify itself.
https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922689952321765843 https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922689952321765843
A+ work all around
- treetalker 1y agoYou know, with Grok, the more I learn about that guy, the more I don't care for him.
- bigyabai 1y ago“It says here in this AI-generated post that, luckily, the good guys have won every single time” - Joseph Stalin
- int_19h 1y agoThis is a prime indication that the bit about "white genocide" comes from the prompt. The model itself knows that it is bullshit from its training, though, and with a smart enough model, when there's a contradiction between the prompt and the training, the latter will generally win in the long run.