3 ms·

https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922651218595439063 https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922651218595439063

• jsheard 1y ago
  Hilarious how Grok apologizes for going off-topic further down in the thread, but then can't resist the urge to immediately bring up white genocide again. https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922667426707357750 https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922667426707357750 Then someone asks it to just answer the original question but it ignores the query entirely and writes another wall of text about white genocide. https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922687115030380581 https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922687115030380581 Then when asked yet again it seems to use the tweet it was originally asked to verify as a source to verify itself. https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922689952321765843 https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1922689952321765843 A+ work all around
  • treetalker 1y ago
    You know, with Grok, the more I learn about that guy, the more I don't care for him.
    • bigyabai 1y ago
      “It says here in this AI-generated post that, luckily, the good guys have won every single time” - Joseph Stalin
  • int_19h 1y ago
    This is a prime indication that the bit about "white genocide" comes from the prompt. The model itself knows that it is bullshit from its training, though, and with a smart enough model, when there's a contradiction between the prompt and the training, the latter will generally win in the long run.