3 ms·
For a more technical dive into startups that have been chugging along with AI in pathology for ~decade, check out this: https://www.owlposting.com/p/what-happe
by epistasis 1y ago
For a more technical dive into startups that have been chugging along with AI in pathology for ~decade, check out this:
https://www.owlposting.com/p/what-happened-to-pathology-ai-companies https://www.owlposting.com/p/what-happened-to-pathology-ai-c...
> One pathology AI founder told me that it wasn’t hospitals or diagnostic labs that showed the most promise. It was R&D groups within Big Pharma. Those scientists and executives wanted new tooling. They were often sitting on massive internal datasets, had real budget allocated to experimental tech, and — critically — had a clear ROI if your model helped shave months off a study or more precisely target the right patient cohort. Most importantly, pharma didn’t care as much about the regulatory headaches, as they weren’t using your model to diagnose patients
- abhishaike 1y ago<3
- yread 1y agoReally nice article, thanks for sharing. With digital pathology ai startups going bust left and right it's quite an accurate analysis. One thing it's missing in the "product" path is preanalytical differences - same tissue processed in different labs can produce wildly different pixels.