4 ms·
Don't act like the ambiguity of their language wasn't intentional. It was. They on purpose worded it in the paper so that investors mass freaked out about the i
by Der_Einzige 1y ago
Don't act like the ambiguity of their language wasn't intentional. It was. They on purpose worded it in the paper so that investors mass freaked out about the idea of GPT-4 for a few million while AI researchers laughed as they read the "this is only the final training run" gigantic astrik.