> You have to basically be a big player that can put up the money and because by any number of the various methods of corruption, you already know that you will

> You have to basically be a big player that can put up the money and because by any number of the various methods of corruption, you already know that you will have government contracts waiting for you on the far side. You seem to working from the faulty premise that FedRAMP only isna concern for durect federal contracting. Because FedRAMP applies to systems with federal data, and because entities other than the federal government often have a mix of federal and non-federal data, it is quite common for a vendor who does not have FedRAMP certification (either at all or for some services) to know by non-corrupt means that some of their customers have workloads that are in-house or with a different vendor due to FedRAMP that they would bring to the first vendor if that vendor was FedRAMP compliant for the services involved.