10 ms·
> (3) Won't have animation, fold-out text, or anything that cannot be be shown on a piece of paper > (4) won't require Javascript or access to external sites
by dqv 1y ago
> (3) Won't have animation, fold-out text, or anything that cannot be be shown on a piece of paper
> (4) won't require Javascript or access to external sites
So about that... https://opensource.adobe.com/dc-acrobat-sdk-docs/library/jsapiref/toc.html https://opensource.adobe.com/dc-acrobat-sdk-docs/library/jsa...
- lmz 1y agoAlso: https://pdfa.org/3d-pdf-showcase/ https://pdfa.org/3d-pdf-showcase/
- izacus 1y agoDid you miss the meaning of the word "require"?
- theamk 1y agothat's the power of legacy. Adobe may think they can add junk to PDF like Javascript support, or lmz's "3D PDF" link below, but since PDFs viewers have a diverse ecosystem, those features won't have a great adoption. And this is actually pretty great, maybe even the best part of PDFs! Companies _know_ that publishing PDF that require 3d-graphics or Javascript means many people won't be able to see them, so they publish good, static PDFs, maintaining virtuous cycle.