3 ms·
> regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems Seems trivial to work around since there is no lega
by tantalor 1y ago
> regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems
Seems trivial to work around since there is no legal definition of AI.
Instead of making your law specific to AI system, you can simply make it slightly broader in scope so it includes AI systems in practice.
For example, prohibition on AI facial recognition in public spaces -> prohibition on any computerized facial recognition
- layer8 1y ago“Automated decision systems” seems pretty broad to me. It would potentially also include a lot of non-AI systems. See, for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_decision-making https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_decision-making.
- nabakin 1y agoThe court system is responsible for interpreting law so playing semantic games doesn't work very well unless you have a corrupt judge who sides with you and is willing to interpret it in this way
- tantalor 1y ago"playing semantic games" is a euphemism for the entire practice of law.
- root_axis 1y agoI don't think it'd be difficult to blur the lines in terms of implementation details in order to "AI launder" desired functionality in such a manner where the "AI" distinction becomes a philosophical debate between SMEs.
- nabakin 1y agoI think you can blur the lines to an extent and if the judge isn't very capable, pull one over on them, but to say an LLM or ML model is not artificial intelligence to a capable judge with a prosecution who points out there is an LLM, it would be hard to get around imo