4 ms·
> No adult has a more visceral sense of societal consequences than someone concerned about creating the future their own child will hopefully thrive in. There
by oarsinsync 1y ago
> No adult has a more visceral sense of societal consequences than someone concerned about creating the future their own child will hopefully thrive in.
There are plenty of parents who have absolutely no sense of this, and plenty of children who have a better sense of this than their parents, because they’ve had to learn the hard way.
Choosing to reproduce, or failing to use birth control, should not give you an extra vote.
- ty6853 1y agoBut it does. The house of representation is based on relative population, so places like Texas end up getting more representation as their voters high some of the highest fertility and their children get counted in the census.
- slowmovintarget 1y agoIf our biggest issues are the state of education, the environment, the state of the economy, the security of the nation, the safety of our neighborhoods, and the civility of the society we live in, who has a bigger stake in all of these outcomes than parents? So why not? I mean, the argument against surely is not that having children is some existential horror or great evil, right? Civilization advances by our children doing better than we did, maybe materially, but morally, ethically, and hopefully in purpose.