2 ms·
> color me sceptic on that one. This is fair but not sufficient to declare "the last thing they want is good data protection laws". > it's all Chrome and iOS
by fsflover 1y ago
> color me sceptic on that one.
This is fair but not sufficient to declare "the last thing they want is good data protection laws".
> it's all Chrome and iOS.
> So, what has Mozilla done with the billions?
This is also fair but has nothing to do with the data protection laws.
> Instead they have sold their soul to the highest (and only) bidder.
It seems they can't continue doing this, given the ongoing legal actions against Google. So let's see.
- selectnull 1y ago> This is fair but... > This is also fair but... Ok, so we can agree that my assesment is fair, but it remains to be seen how the data protection story pans out. >> Instead they have sold their soul to the highest (and only) bidder. > It seems they can't continue doing this, given the ongoing legal actions against Google. So let's see. Just to be clear: I think that Mozilla should have taken that money (and possibly more) and *invest* in Firefox and build a rainy day fund (which are coming soon). Instead, they spent it on whatevers and done a layoff.
- fsflover 1y ago> Ok, so we can agree that my assesment is fair My point is that your assessment is largely irrelevant to your original message about the data protection. It doesn't really support it.
- selectnull 1y agoRight. Time will tell.