3 ms·
You don't describe this like a person that possesses any domain expertise in the subject. It wasn't a mechanism called the Chevron deference, it was law, as de
by throwaway5752 1y ago
You don't describe this like a person that possesses any domain expertise in the subject.
It wasn't a mechanism called the Chevron deference, it was law, as determined by the Supreme Court in "Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council".
The deference was on the part of the courts deferring to executive regulators when there was ambiguity, since the regulators were experts in a given field and the courts were generally legal experts. Not Congress.
That was overturned in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
"non-elected, life-long positioned government employees" so, you mean, federal employees. Nothing about it is "life-long", you made that up. They could quit, change jobs, or be fired.
And "criminals" is false. It applied to civil statutes, not criminal ones. It goes on.