Objectively, this article is bullshit. What is the source ? An unidentified "data partner". That just means, this is non-reproducible. So this is not science.

Objectively, this article is bullshit. What is the source ? An unidentified "data partner". That just means, this is non-reproducible. So this is not science. Actually, there is a another paper, reproducible, it's non conclusive. The social explanation of the phenomena (if there is any) are clearly politically oriented.