I think the only thing that doesn't quite make sense to me: > The model takes into account the fact that parties are historically connected to specific social

I think the only thing that doesn't quite make sense to me: > The model takes into account the fact that parties are historically connected to specific social groups: the right with the upper classes and religious conservatives, the left with workers and progressives. I would posit that both the right and the left have "upper classes" and "workers" The last paragraph even says: > “The left,” Tabellini concludes, “has underestimated the fact that culture can matter more than income. Seems like mixed messaging.