4 ms·
> Instead, data needs to be viewed more abstractly. There is no instead here. This is not a choice that has to be made once and for all and there is no correct
by StopDisinfo910 1y ago
> Instead, data needs to be viewed more abstractly.
There is no instead here. This is not a choice that has to be made once and for all and there is no correct way to view things.
Languages exist if you want to have a very abstract view of the data you are manipulating and they come with toolchains and compilers that will turn that into low level representation.
That doesn’t preclude the interest of languages which expose this low level architecture.
- yusina 1y agoSure. But solving problems at the wrong level of abstraction is always doomed to fail.
- StopDisinfo910 1y agoThat would be true if it was always the wrong level of abstraction. It's obviously not for the low level parts of the toolchain which are required to make very abstract languages work.