3 ms·
It's not "my designated" definition. It's the one in the dictionary. And my implication was that even when I or you agree with the goals of an organization, whe
by mariusor 1y ago
It's not "my designated" definition. It's the one in the dictionary. And my implication was that even when I or you agree with the goals of an organization, when what they're doing is "terrorizing" people, then they are terrorists.
I know it's uncomfortable to think that we might side with the terrorists, god knows we've been conditioned by countless hours in counter-strike to think they're the bad guys, but sometimes that's what we feel, and we should make peace with that. It's OK to agree with the goals, but disagree with the means.
- vFunct 1y ago[flagged]
- bbg2401 1y agoMassacres are legitimate military tactics? Do military tactics include atrocities?
- TFYS 1y ago[flagged]
- tomhow 1y agoPlease don't comment in the flamewar style on Hacker news. We want HN to be a place where people can discuss difficult topics, but that requires people to heed the guidelines and comment respectfully. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html