3 ms·
The gap between demo impressive and reliably useful in real-world scenarios is still huge in a lot of cases. That said, I think the concern isn't that AI is fla
by KolibriFly 1y ago
The gap between demo impressive and reliably useful in real-world scenarios is still huge in a lot of cases. That said, I think the concern isn't that AI is flawless now, but that it's improving at a pace we haven't really seen with other technologies
- __loam 1y agoIt's really funny to see someone say this technology, which seems to be plateauing with marginal improvements after a few years, is improving at a pace we have never seen before, in an industry that is built on the microprocessor. Astoundingly ignorant.
- mallardgryph 1y agoThe marketing for it all has been something else. It's a technology that demos extremely well, and is surface level very impressive, and to those who wern't paying any attention to its evolution, appeared to come out of nowhere. But this line of "its only going to get even better" is a mantra that's endlessly expounded on, a brain worm even. It's never backed up with any observable evidence. It's marketing that they're tricking people into repeating.
- otabdeveloper4 1y agoCorrect. We've reached negative returns on increasing parameter counts. This is a dead end unless they figure out how to microtune models on ultra-specific niches.
- bobxmax 1y agothere are hundreds of thousands of developers, lawyers, artists, musicians, etc who have transformed what they're doing with AI
- KolibriFly 1y agoThe progress is fast, no doubt - but the hype sometimes skips over how messy the middle still is.