3 ms·

Can you state more clearly why it's deeply flawed? Because while LLMs obviously have massive limitations, so do humans, and it's not entirely clear to me that

• baby_souffle 1y ago
  > ... some synthesis of the two can't produce much better results than either on its own. In theory, I agree with you. The world "some" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there though. I only hope that whatever definition of some emerges, it's not a horribly flawed one.
  • imiric 1y ago
    That's my hope as well. A responsible doctor that uses technology critically and knows its limitations is fine with me. My concern is that it's more likely that whatever AI says will be taken for granted, overruling any human judgment, because they're supposed to be expert systems that scored highly on some made-up benchmark produced by the same company that trained the model. We see this today with AI-generated content on the web, and a flood of sloppily put together software produced by people who swear that AI is making them more productive. There's little interest in judging the output, and a lot of interest in lazy cash grabs. There are no guardrails in place in the healthcare industry AFAIA to prevent the same happening there, which is a scary thought.
• smusamashah 1y ago
  You would not hire or go to a a mentally unstable doctor. If a doc hallucinates or makes a mistake, it will be rare. They can self introspect and work on it if they realise there mistake even. AI is NOT same. It has no self reflection, hallucination isn't rare. AI is not mentally stable in any sense.