3 ms·
The reason those are allowed is because they don't compete with the source material. A thumbnail of a movie is never a substitute for a movie. LLMs seek to be
by const_cast 1y ago
The reason those are allowed is because they don't compete with the source material. A thumbnail of a movie is never a substitute for a movie.
LLMs seek to be a for-profit replacement for a variety of paid sources. They say "hey, you can get the same thing as Service X for less money with us!"
That's a problem, regardless of how you go about it. It's probably fine if I watch a movie with my friends, who cares. But distributing it over the internet for free is a different issue.
- gruez 1y ago>The reason those are allowed is because they don't compete with the source material. A thumbnail of a movie is never a substitute for a movie. >LLMs seek to be a for-profit replacement for a variety of paid sources. They say "hey, you can get the same thing as Service X for less money with us!" What's an LLM supposed to be a substitute for? Are people using them to generate entire books or news articles, rather than buying a book or an issue of the new york times? Same goes for movies. No one is substituting marvel movies with sora video.
- const_cast 1y ago> Are people using them to generate entire books or news articles, rather than buying a book or an issue of the new york times? Yes. > No one is substituting marvel movies with sora video. Yeah because sora kind of sucks. It's great technology, but turns out text is just a little bit easier to generate than 3D videos. Once sora gets good, you bet your ass they will.