3 ms·
It's not about the tool, how you use it, or even how it works. It's about the end result. I can go through and manually compress "Revenge of the Sith" and then
by const_cast 1y ago
It's not about the tool, how you use it, or even how it works. It's about the end result.
I can go through and manually compress "Revenge of the Sith" and then post it online. Or, I can use a compression program like handbrake. Regardless, it is copyright infringement.
Can AI reproduce almost* the same things that exist in it's training data? Sometimes, so sometimes it's copyright infringement. Doesn't help that it's explicitly for-profit and seeks to obsolesce and siphon value from it's training material.
- Suppafly 1y ago>Sometimes, so sometimes it's copyright infringement. So in those cases, the original authors might have a case. Generally you don't see these LLM doing that though. >Doesn't help that it's explicitly for-profit and seeks to obsolesce and siphon value from it's training material. Doesn't hurt either. That's a reason to be butthurt, but that's not a legal argument.
- const_cast 1y ago> That's a reason to be butthurt, but that's not a legal argument. It is a legal argument, fair use specifically takes into account the intention. Just using it for commercial ventures makes the water hotter.
- Suppafly 1y ago>It is a legal argument Not a very good one then.