3 ms·
Sam Altman's eye-scanning orbs have arrived, sparking curiosity and fear
- proxynoproxy 1y agoSam’s iris harvesting plan will continue as long as the incentive, worldcoin, holds value. There were coins printed out of nothing by a guy called Sam backing an enterprise last time too.
- evbogue 1y agoI don't understand how this works. If they aren't storing the iris scans, then how can this be used to login with your iris scan?
- schwartzworld 1y agoInstead of storing plaintext passwords, most companies store a hash of that password, essentially applying a one-way transformation to it and saving the result of that. I don’t have to know your password, I can just apply the hash algorithm to whatever you enter in the input and if that matches, we’re golden. No reason you couldn’t apply the same philosophy to biometric data.
- evbogue 1y agoYes, I agree on passwords since the characters are the same every time. Does every iris scan produce the same hash though?
- solumunus 1y agoDoes your iris change between scans? I assume not.
- shaftway 1y agoDoes it need to be exactly the same? I assume it's a perceptual hash with a liveness check.
- kurikuri 1y agoThis feels like a flippant response. The question you responded to was ‘would the hash of the iris would be the same?’ It isn’t as if you’ll get an identical image of the iris every time, and hashes tend to behave chaotically for even slightly different values. If we compare this to something like password salting and hashing, it isn’t clear how we can maintain the constant salted hash value if we swap the password for a digital representation of a person’s iris.
- schwartzworld 1y agoDidn’t say literally the same thing. Obviously it would be more complex. but I’d assume a fair amount of consistency between scans. How else would you compare at all?