> If you just have property rights and no human rights, and have everything dictated by the ability to satisfy a market participant's desire to wealth, you're g

> If you just have property rights and no human rights, and have everything dictated by the ability to satisfy a market participant's desire to wealth, you're going to have a lot of horrible things justified by that desire to create wealth. I don't see how you'd have a "lot of horrible things." Doesn't the market system optimize for the maximum good, so if the market system produces a thing, isn't that thing good by definition?