5 ms·
Please argue in good faith. A new research paper is obviously materially different from "rearranging that text to create a marginally new text".
by dfxm12 1y ago
Please argue in good faith. A new research paper is obviously materially different from "rearranging that text to create a marginally new text".
- shkkmo 1y agoThe comment is responding to this line: > If an AI reads 100 scientific papers and churns out a new one, it is plagiarism. That is a specific claim that is being directly addressed and pretty clearly qualifies as "good faith".
- int_19h 1y ago"Rearranging text" is not what modern LLMs do though, unless you specifically ask them to.
- dfxm12 1y agoI didn't make this claim. Feel free to bring a cogent argument to a commenter who did.
- gruez 1y ago>I didn't make this claim ??? Did you not literally comment the following? >A new research paper is obviously materially different from "rearranging that text to create a marginally new text". What did you mean by that, if that's not your claim?
- dfxm12 1y agoI made that comment, but the bit in quotes is not my claim. I was quoting a grandparent post. If you read from the top, the quotation marks and general flow of the thread should make this clear.