3 ms·
I'm quite perplexed by the following point: Counterintuitive Performance: The best-performing configuration actually achieved 146.84% accuracy preservation in
by magicalhippo 1y ago
I'm quite perplexed by the following point:
Counterintuitive Performance: The best-performing configuration actually achieved 146.84% accuracy preservation in a Mars radiation environment - meaning it performed better under radiation than in normal conditions.
How can it perform better in a radiation environment than under normal conditions? My immediate gut feeling is that something is very wrong.
That said, not my usual cup of tea this.
- r0nlt 1y agoAnything's possible. That part is mostly clickbait for marketing, but at the same time, I wasn't focused on that part too much, just a stat I saw while testing and used it to market. I'll probably explore the situation more down the road to see how sound the theory is, but overall, the framework has a solid foundation even if we were to take that part out.It was mostly the random noise though would be the simplest answer.