> But you can read the books right in the library and learn from them. You can read some of the books. Natural limitations prevent you from reading any substan

> But you can read the books right in the library and learn from them. You can read some of the books. Natural limitations prevent you from reading any substantial number. And the scale makes all the difference in any conversation. All laws were written accounting for the reality of the time. Humans have a limited storage and processing capacity so laws relied on that assumption. Now that we have systems with far more extensive capabilities in some regards, shouldn't the law follow? When people's right to "bear arms" was enshrined in the US constitution it accounted for what "arms" were at the time. Since then weapons evolved and today you are not allowed to bear automatic rifles or machine guns despite them being just weapons that can fire more and faster. Every time there's a discussion on AI one side relies way too much on the "but humas also" argument and are way too superficial with everything else.