> AI software will increasingly be seen as similar to human intelligence. And humans also do not breach copyright by reading what others have written and incorp

> AI software will increasingly be seen as similar to human intelligence. And humans also do not breach copyright by reading what others have written and incorporating it into their understanding of the world. In that case, you shouldn't be allowed to own an AI, or its creative output, just like you aren't allowed to own an enslaved human, or to steal their creative output. So much of the discourse around IP and AI is the most blatantly farcical Soviet-Bugs-Bunny argument for "Our IP" that I've ever seen. Property rights are only sacred until they stand in the way of a trillion-dollar business.