4 ms·

Lazarus is still my favorite when developing desktop apps. Language is not a problem. Pascal is just C/C++ in another favor. LCL/VCL is a wonderful library, ev

by foldl2022 1y ago

Lazarus is still my favorite when developing desktop apps. Language is not a problem. Pascal is just C/C++ in another favor. LCL/VCL is a wonderful library, everything just works like what I am expecting.

nicoloren 1y ago
Me too! I have a software in production for a client made with Lazarus 3 (in Pascal of course) and everybody loves the "Windows feel" of the Gui. On Linux there is Gambas [1] wich is like Lazarus but for Basic. [1] https://gambaswiki.org/website/en/main.html https://gambaswiki.org/website/en/main.html
- fuzztester 1y ago
  Lazarus is available on Linux too, and on some other platforms as well, is what I've read on its site.
croes 1y ago
Pascal is more ALGOL than C
- lproven 1y ago
  ALGOL-60 was huge, in around 1960. Niklaus Wirth had a detailed proposal for the next version of ALGOL, to be called ALGOL-X. The ALGOL committee rejected it, choosing a competing and much more complex language headed by Adriaan van Wijngaarden. This became ALGOL-68 -- and killed ALGOL. Wirth took what was known as ALGOL-W and turned it into Pascal. FWIW I wrote about this: https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/04/niklaus_wirth_obituary/ https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/04/niklaus_wirth_obituar... https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/07/algol_68_comes_to_gcc/ https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/07/algol_68_comes_to_gcc... Another offshoot of Algol-60 was CPL, intended to be more general-purpose and capable. But it was big and hard work to get it working. So Martin Richards designed, a simpler intermediate version, BCPL. (He also built an OS in it, TRIPOS. This formed part of AmigaOS 1.x.) BCPL was further stripped down to B, and then evolved into C.
major505 1y ago
I had a client habing trouble with and old vb6 software they where using in production. Replaced it with a lazarus app, and been running for 10 years now without problems.

nicoloren 1y ago

Me too! I have a software in production for a client made with Lazarus 3 (in Pascal of course) and everybody loves the "Windows feel" of the Gui. On Linux there is Gambas [1] wich is like Lazarus but for Basic. [1] https://gambaswiki.org/website/en/main.html https://gambaswiki.org/website/en/main.html

fuzztester 1y ago
Lazarus is available on Linux too, and on some other platforms as well, is what I've read on its site.

croes 1y ago

Pascal is more ALGOL than C

lproven 1y ago
ALGOL-60 was huge, in around 1960. Niklaus Wirth had a detailed proposal for the next version of ALGOL, to be called ALGOL-X. The ALGOL committee rejected it, choosing a competing and much more complex language headed by Adriaan van Wijngaarden. This became ALGOL-68 -- and killed ALGOL. Wirth took what was known as ALGOL-W and turned it into Pascal. FWIW I wrote about this: https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/04/niklaus_wirth_obituary/ https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/04/niklaus_wirth_obituar... https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/07/algol_68_comes_to_gcc/ https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/07/algol_68_comes_to_gcc... Another offshoot of Algol-60 was CPL, intended to be more general-purpose and capable. But it was big and hard work to get it working. So Martin Richards designed, a simpler intermediate version, BCPL. (He also built an OS in it, TRIPOS. This formed part of AmigaOS 1.x.) BCPL was further stripped down to B, and then evolved into C.

major505 1y ago

I had a client habing trouble with and old vb6 software they where using in production. Replaced it with a lazarus app, and been running for 10 years now without problems.