> You have 2 teams using the same data, getting to the same conclusion. > You also have an author that's known from other sources, with writings that we alread

> You have 2 teams using the same data, getting to the same conclusion. > You also have an author that's known from other sources, with writings that we already "have". > Then you have a team of experts reviewing this. Only the first of those points is evidence against the result being hallucinated.