3 ms·
> Chrome isn't there to play dirty, it's there so competitors can't. Like Manifest V3, which explicitly makes it harder to strip out Google's own ad products o
by heylook 1y ago
> Chrome isn't there to play dirty, it's there so competitors can't.
Like Manifest V3, which explicitly makes it harder to strip out Google's own ad products on websites you visit?
> without Google all that BS would get bundled in the browser.
Or maybe it wouldn't. There are already lots of other browsers that don't.
- surajrmal 1y agoManifest v3 being tied to ads is a fantasy fiction. This is no proof of it and ample evidence it is a good security move which other browsers did first. Is apple doing similar things with Safari for nefarious reasons?
- d1sxeyes 1y ago> This is no proof of it and ample evidence it is a good security move which other browsers did first. You crush up the bitter pill in a spoonful of jam to make it easier to digest. > Is apple doing similar things with Safari for nefarious reasons? Yes? Look at what they tried to get away with with PWAs as an example.