You wrote: "You can't have DEI in math itself" And I quoted it and pointed out that I had not said anything to the contrary. And you reply now "I've already ex

You wrote: "You can't have DEI in math itself" And I quoted it and pointed out that I had not said anything to the contrary. And you reply now "I've already explained why that claim makes no sense". What claim? Your statement, or my pointing out that I did not disagree with it?