> after my first conversation, where I got it to tell me a fair bit about how Postgres works See, I always start with conversations about things I already know

> after my first conversation, where I got it to tell me a fair bit about how Postgres works See, I always start with conversations about things I already know about, and they bullshit me enough that I'm wary of Gell-Mann Amnesia when asking them about things I don't know about. They output a lot of things that seem plausible but the way they blend fact and fiction with no regard for the truth keeps me extremely distrusting of them. That is to say: after your conversation, did you ask for citations and go read the primary sources? Because if you did not, the model likely mislead you about Postgres in subtle ways.