3 ms·
> Most people just aren’t interested. Which makes sense, really. Buying an expensive pair of glasses so that I can point at an object and say “what is that” is
by afavour 1y ago
> Most people just aren’t interested.
Which makes sense, really. Buying an expensive pair of glasses so that I can point at an object and say “what is that” is a cool parlour trick but I can imagine very few scenarios where I’ve wished I had that functionality.
Realtime translation… absolutely a feature I’d use. For a week a year, max. IMO the killer, everyday application just isn’t there yet. I’m still not sure what it would be.
- glhaynes 1y agoAnd those are also all things that a smartphone can do (often a little worse, admittedly). Which you'll have with you anyway because of all the things it does much better than glasses can and likely ever could.