4 ms·
Agreed, and as someone who's used it for work most days since 3.0 launch, it's likely way more efficient in outcomes - maybe 30-40%. But as the GP said, there's
by averageRoyalty 1y ago
Agreed, and as someone who's used it for work most days since 3.0 launch, it's likely way more efficient in outcomes - maybe 30-40%. But as the GP said, there's no paradigm shift. All the new features feel very gimicky, and OpenAI lost their first mover advantage quite a while ago.
- stavros 1y agoHave you guys seen Deep Research? I'm completely blown away that I can have the thing make entire trip itineraries for me, something I just could not do before without paying a human lots of money.
- technol0gic 1y agohalkias is that you? :P
- hatefulmoron 1y agoI've used the deep research features from OpenAI, Grok, and most recently Anthropic. They're super impressive, but I can't shake the feeling that they're mostly giving me a summarized explanation of what the first 2 pages of Google Search is returning. Also, insofar that they're researching a topic, they're not sufficiently critical. They are highly influenced by what they read, and they tend to take the results they're given more or less at face value. For instance, I asked about a medical product for my girlfriend. I explicitly asked for a critical look at its efficacy, any studies in the area, etc.. and it seemed like 90% of the sources it considered were from the product's own website. It basically gave me an uncritical reporting of what they said about their own product.