Then what did your second sentence ["These are not scientific observations in any sense. What does the author do to confirm or refute her psychological theories

Then what did your second sentence ["These are not scientific observations in any sense. What does the author do to confirm or refute her psychological theories about others?"] intend? > She's very good at telling stories, but these stories feel like fiction, not hard fact. There was no claim of objective fact. This is a Substack piece, not a peer-reviewed submission to "Nature" journal.