If we must do science then why must it be about the validity of her observations? I'd be more interesting to know which unproven-social-deductions are commonly

If we must do science then why must it be about the validity of her observations? I'd be more interesting to know which unproven-social-deductions are commonly made by the general population. Its frankly ridiculous to critique a post not just on its lack of rigor, but on its merit in regards to a hypothesis you've pulled out of thin air.