3 ms·
> Vitalism is utterly foreign to anything found in Aquinas or Aristotle. This is simply not true, and I've quoted the passages from Aquinas that explicitly ass
by bloaf 1y ago
> Vitalism is utterly foreign to anything found in Aquinas or Aristotle.
This is simply not true, and I've quoted the passages from Aquinas that explicitly assert metaphysical differences between living and non-living matter in this very thread.
- lo_zamoyski 1y agoYou gravely misunderstand what you are reading. If you wish to understand what Aquinas means, you ought to understand what Aristotle means by substance, form, and soul, what powers are in this context. You appear to be sneaking in a Cartesian dualism here. If you want a tidy introduction to metaphysics of this sort, consider this one [0]. [0] https://a.co/d/3g8SgTf https://a.co/d/3g8SgTf
- geye1234 1y agoPlease see my reply to your other post. He does explicitly assert metaphysical* differences, but this no no way implies what you think it implies. *Assuming by metaphysical you mean formal.