4 ms·

Almost all the things in this list were acquired from someone else that built them, rebranded, and then given away for free, taking much of the money out of the

Almost all the things in this list were acquired from someone else that built them, rebranded, and then given away for free, taking much of the money out of the market that allowed that product to be built. Without Google giving away the one winner they chose to acquire, you'd have options again. I built my free web stats service in 2004 because I couldn't afford an Urchin license. Google bought Urchin Live and rebranded it as Google Analytics, and gave it away for free. My service barely pays for itself 20+ years later, but I'm still here and would have an offering for that market on day one that Google Analytics shut down. So would dozens of others.

jader201 1y ago
> Almost all the things in this list were acquired from someone else that built them, rebranded, and then given away for free Nearly everything that was acquired was a) already free, and b) built (and given away for free) in hopes that someone like Google would acquire them. If you look at most startups, their exit strategy is acquisition. Some would live to IPO, but that is a much tougher road. It could be argued that IPO is a less likely exit strategy because of Google’s and others’ position, but I think it’s disingenuous to imply that startups (that are already giving away their products for free) are getting acquired as a last resort. Most CEOs plan and hope for it.
- no_wizard 1y ago
  > Most CEOs plan and hope for it I don’t think so, at least, it’s not their main motivation. For most, I imagine the VC fueled free period is to lock up customers and increase you have their sensitive data, you start making moves so you can start to charge them, usually a fairly hefty sum. It’s a classic lock in strategy.
- int_19h 1y ago
  > If you look at most startups, their exit strategy is acquisition And that is a part of the problem.
mrDmrTmrJ 1y ago
Google maps Gmail Chrome Waymo Were all built within google. For most people (who do not sell software on the internet) we get a great trade from the current state of things!
- dangrossman 1y ago
  Gmail is the only product you listed that Google started itself. Google Maps was built on the acquisitions of Where 2 Technologies, Keyhole and ZipDash. Chrome is based on WebKit, built at Apple. Waymo's hardware came from the acquisition of 510 Systems, and the software came from the acquihiring of the team that developed Stanford's self-driving cars for the 2005 and 2007 DARPA challenges, who brought their code with them.
  - Y_Y 1y ago
    For the record, Apple is playing the same game. Chrome's renderer (Blink) is indeed a fork of Safari's renderer (WebKit) but that in turn was forked from Konqueror's renderer (KHTML).

jader201 1y ago

> Almost all the things in this list were acquired from someone else that built them, rebranded, and then given away for free Nearly everything that was acquired was a) already free, and b) built (and given away for free) in hopes that someone like Google would acquire them. If you look at most startups, their exit strategy is acquisition. Some would live to IPO, but that is a much tougher road. It could be argued that IPO is a less likely exit strategy because of Google’s and others’ position, but I think it’s disingenuous to imply that startups (that are already giving away their products for free) are getting acquired as a last resort. Most CEOs plan and hope for it.

no_wizard 1y ago
> Most CEOs plan and hope for it I don’t think so, at least, it’s not their main motivation. For most, I imagine the VC fueled free period is to lock up customers and increase you have their sensitive data, you start making moves so you can start to charge them, usually a fairly hefty sum. It’s a classic lock in strategy.
int_19h 1y ago
> If you look at most startups, their exit strategy is acquisition And that is a part of the problem.

mrDmrTmrJ 1y ago

Google maps Gmail Chrome Waymo Were all built within google. For most people (who do not sell software on the internet) we get a great trade from the current state of things!

dangrossman 1y ago
Gmail is the only product you listed that Google started itself. Google Maps was built on the acquisitions of Where 2 Technologies, Keyhole and ZipDash. Chrome is based on WebKit, built at Apple. Waymo's hardware came from the acquisition of 510 Systems, and the software came from the acquihiring of the team that developed Stanford's self-driving cars for the 2005 and 2007 DARPA challenges, who brought their code with them.
- Y_Y 1y ago
  For the record, Apple is playing the same game. Chrome's renderer (Blink) is indeed a fork of Safari's renderer (WebKit) but that in turn was forked from Konqueror's renderer (KHTML).