4 ms·
Interesting to me that the Apple II+ was the only one in the comparison matrix that supported only upper case letters. That lead me to this: https://www.vinta
by colinbartlett 1y ago
Interesting to me that the Apple II+ was the only one in the comparison matrix that supported only upper case letters.
That lead me to this:
https://www.vintagecomputing.com/index.php/archives/2833/why-the-apple-ii-didnt-support-lowercase-letters https://www.vintagecomputing.com/index.php/archives/2833/why...
- classichasclass 1y agoIt's a fair cop against the II+ but there are other things in the comparison which are mildly hinky. I find their characterization of POKEY a little unfair, even though I think SID is superior, and the CP/M option on the C64 was nearly useless because the 1541 didn't read MFM formats. (Much more useful on the C128, but you needed a 1571 disk drive, and by 1985 CP/M was on its way out.) The keyboard criteria are also somewhat of an Apples-to-Commodores comparison, so to speak. Still, it's hard-hitting ad copy and it was Tramiel's Commodore -- he was determined to win, by golly.
- vardump 1y agoWasn’t POKEY out of tune due to limited frequency register? Making it hard to produce music that sounds good.
- _wire_ 1y agoBut there was the Apple 80 column card option with full ascii. Add USCD Pascal and suddenly it morphed from plaything to a programming-for-computer-science trainer.
- mixmastamyk 1y agoThe Apple is almost five years older than the C64, an eternity in that era.