4 ms·

Which has absolutely nothing to do with what we are discussing: General content versus personalised, targeted, actionable and specific content.

KennyBlanken 1y ago
It absolutely has to do with your entirely unsupported claim that chatting with an uncensored LLM will cause people to commit violent acts. Books, music (NIN was a popular target), movies, and video games are all things hand-wringingers have said would make people do bad things and predicted an outbreak of violence from. Every single time they're prove wrong. Hand-wringers said rock and roll / Elvis thrusting his hips was going to cause an explosion of teenage sex/pregnancies. Never happened. > General content versus personalised, targeted, actionable and specific content. What the hell does any of that mean? You just vomited a bunch of meaningless adjectives, but I think you're trying to make the same exact argument people used against shooting games; that it was somehow different because the person was actually involved. And yet the mass violence never materialized. LLMs are easily jailbroken and have been around for ~2 years. Strange we haven't seen a single story about someone committing violent crime because of conversations they had with an AI. You're just the latest generation of hand-wringer. Stop trying to incite moral panic and control others because something makes you uncomfortable.
- sofixa 1y ago
  > absolutely has to do with your entirely unsupported claim that chatting with an uncensored LLM will cause people to commit violent acts https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/23/technology/characterai-lawsuit-teen-suicide.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/23/technology/characterai-la... It's a complicated story, but let's not pretend that people can't develop parasocial relationships with AIs and act on them.

4 ms·

Which has absolutely nothing to do with what we are discussing: General content versus personalised, targeted, actionable and specific content.

by threeseed 1y ago

KennyBlanken 1y ago
It absolutely has to do with your entirely unsupported claim that chatting with an uncensored LLM will cause people to commit violent acts. Books, music (NIN was a popular target), movies, and video games are all things hand-wringingers have said would make people do bad things and predicted an outbreak of violence from. Every single time they're prove wrong. Hand-wringers said rock and roll / Elvis thrusting his hips was going to cause an explosion of teenage sex/pregnancies. Never happened. > General content versus personalised, targeted, actionable and specific content. What the hell does any of that mean? You just vomited a bunch of meaningless adjectives, but I think you're trying to make the same exact argument people used against shooting games; that it was somehow different because the person was actually involved. And yet the mass violence never materialized. LLMs are easily jailbroken and have been around for ~2 years. Strange we haven't seen a single story about someone committing violent crime because of conversations they had with an AI. You're just the latest generation of hand-wringer. Stop trying to incite moral panic and control others because something makes you uncomfortable.
- sofixa 1y ago
  > absolutely has to do with your entirely unsupported claim that chatting with an uncensored LLM will cause people to commit violent acts https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/23/technology/characterai-lawsuit-teen-suicide.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/23/technology/characterai-la... It's a complicated story, but let's not pretend that people can't develop parasocial relationships with AIs and act on them.