3 ms·
They've always seemed informative and do a good job of showing their sources. How big a deal is the single-word true/false judgement for an ambiguous claim if a
by mikem170 1y ago
They've always seemed informative and do a good job of showing their sources. How big a deal is the single-word true/false judgement for an ambiguous claim if all the relevant details are summarized?
- lowbloodsugar 1y agoThey weren’t.
- mikem170 1y agoIs this [0] the Snopes article you were talking about, on the Bernie Sander rally? They rate it "mostly true" and in the summary mentioned the true attendance and the false photo, just like you said they should have. I don't get what you are saying. They seem on the ball. [0] https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/27000-people-came-to-a-bernie-sanders-rally-in-california/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/27000-people-came-to-a-ber...