3 ms·
It's like these AI vendors looked at the decades of experience they had with making stable APIs for clients and said nah, fuck it.
by morkalork 1y ago
It's like these AI vendors looked at the decades of experience they had with making stable APIs for clients and said nah, fuck it.
- voidspark 1y agoBut that is "2.5 preview", not the final release version.
- jeroenhd 1y agoFirst of all, the API is experimental, so a healthcare provider choosing not to wait for a stable API is already pretty stupid. Then there's a variability of LLMs as they get trained. LLMs are (as currently implemented) not deterministic. The randomness that gets injected is what makes it somewhat decent. An LLM could at one point output a document filled with banana emoji and still be functioning otherwise correctly if you hit the right quirk in the weights file. Reusing general purpose LLMs for healthcare has got to be some of the most utterly idiotic, as well as dystopian, ideas. For every report of a trauma survivor, there's fanfiction from a rape fetishist in the training set. One day Google's filters will let one bleed into the other and the lack of care from these healthcare platforms will cause some pretty horific problems as a result.