2 ms·
Over 10% of children? That sounds like a flawed testing method or toxic environment, not a disease.
by letwhile 1y ago
Over 10% of children? That sounds like a flawed testing method or toxic environment, not a disease.
- resoluteteeth 1y agoCan you explain why it being over 10% of children would make it not a disease?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- garylkz 1y agoBut really, if like more than 50% of children has ADHD, maybe it's not really a "defect" but rather a "trait" of some human. Unless you're implying that half of the humanity that has ADHD are defective humans. Just a thought
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- habinero 1y agoWhy? What's wrong with humans having variance?