2 ms·
"People act in furtherance of their interests, yes" [by invoking the power of the State]. There, FTFY. It was implied, was it not? Perhaps that is what shoul
by cryptonector 1y ago
"People act in furtherance of their interests, yes" [by invoking the power of the State].
There, FTFY. It was implied, was it not?
Perhaps that is what should happen here, but let's not quibble about it.
- throwanem 1y ago"Invoking the power of the state?" Good heavens, they've only filed an amicus brief. "Begging the presently authorized tenant of a precisely defined and circumscribed aliquot of the delegated power of the state" would be a more accurate way to put it. I appreciate that's not as florid, nor as floridly serviceable to anyone else's interest in pursuing this conversation. As I said before, though...